Theory of balance in criminal procedure

目录
序言
一 选题意义
二 理论预设与展开框架
三 研究方法与视角
上篇 刑事诉讼平衡论的基本理论
第一章 刑事诉讼平衡论的基本范畴
一 刑事诉讼法律价值层面的平衡
二 刑事诉讼目的之间的平衡
三 刑事诉讼所涉及的多元化利益之间的平衡
四 小结
第二章 刑事诉讼平衡论的法哲学基础
第一节 主体性原则——平衡论的基石
一 哲学视野中的主体和主体性
二 主体性原则的基本内涵
三 主体性哲学的价值
第二节 理性主义——刑事诉讼平衡论的知识准则
一 理性主义的基本内涵
二 刑事诉讼程序的理性化过程
三 现代刑事诉讼程序的正当化过程是反思理性的体现和要求
第三节 诉讼民主——协商民主在刑事诉讼中的表现
一 民主的实质
二 民主的内在价值——自主原则的实现
三 协商民主(Deliberative Democracy)——民主理论发展的新方向
四 诉讼民主——协商民主在法律领域的表现
第三章 实现刑事诉讼平衡的基本原则
第一节 无罪推定原则
一 无罪推定原则的基本含义
二 无罪推定原则对刑事诉讼程序的价值
三 无罪推定原则对平衡机制构建的意义
第二节 控辩双方平等对抗原则
一 控辩双方平等对抗原则的基本含义与实质
二 控辩双方平等对抗原则对于平衡机制构建的具体要求
第三节 比例原则
一 比例原则的理念渊源
二 比例原则的基本含义
三 比例原则在刑事诉讼中的体现
四 比例原则对于实现刑事诉讼平衡所具有的意义
第四节 令状主义原则
一 令状主义原则的含义
二 令状主义原则的实质
三 令状主义原则对平衡机制构建的意义
第五节 一事不再理原则
一 一事不再理原则的基本含义及适用
二 一事不再理原则的普遍性意义
三 一事不再理原则的例外
四 一事不再理原则的发展变化与“所有人正义的实现”
第四章 刑事诉讼中的平衡机制
第一节 平衡的支点——法院
一 司法权的性质——判断权
二 司法权的特征
三 现代司法权的功能
第二节 审前程序中的平衡机制
一 司法审查机制
二 赋予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人以防御权
三 小结
第三节 庭前证据开示与平衡机制
一 证据开示制度
二 大陆法系国家辩护人、被告人的阅卷权
三 小结
第四节 审判阶段的平衡机制
一 保障控辩双方平等对抗的机制
二 平衡论视野下审判模式的选择与程序构建
三 小结
下篇 平衡论视野下我国刑事诉讼改革
第五章 我国刑事诉讼平衡观的确立
第一节 我国刑事诉讼平衡观确立的必要性
一 刑事诉讼法律观念上的失衡
二 诉讼制度上的失衡
第二节 我国刑事诉讼平衡观确立的社会条件
一 经济条件：社会主义市场经济的建立和发展
二 政治条件：社会主义民主与依法治国
三 思想条件：以人为本
四 国际背景：全球化和人权保障
第三节 我国刑事诉讼平衡观的确立
一 刑事诉讼中法律利益保障上的平衡
二 刑事诉讼法律价值之间的平衡
三 综合法律功能观的确立
第六章 平衡论视野下我国的刑事诉讼结构与程序设计
第一节 刑事诉讼结构
一 对我国刑事诉讼构造的理性分析
二 平衡论视野下我国刑事诉讼构造的构建
第二节 诉讼参与人基本诉讼权利的确立
一 赋予被追诉人基本诉讼权利
二 赋予被害人基本诉讼权利
第三节 具体程序改革
一 审前程序诉讼化
二 审判程序改革与完善
三 再审程序改革与重构
主要参考文献
后记
Preface 1
Significance of Topic Selection
Theory Supposition and Framework Layout
Research Method and Pmspectives
PART ONE FUNDAMENTALS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE THEORY OF BALANCE
Chapter 1 Basic Scope of Criminal Procedure Theory of Balance
The Balance of the Values
The Balance of Purposes
The Balance of Multiple Interests
Summaruze
Chapter 2 Jurisprudential Foundation of Criminal Procedure Theory of Balance
2. 1 Principle of Subjectivity-The Fundation of the Theory of Balance
2.1.1 The Subject and Subjectivity in Philosophy
2.1.2 The Meaning of the Principle of Subjectivity
2.1.3 The Values of the Principle of Subjetivity
2.2 The Principle of Reasonableness-The Intellectual Norms of the Theory of Balance
2.2.1 The Meaning of the Principle of Reasonableness
2.2.2 The Reasonable Process of the Criminal Procedure
2.2.3 Due Process of the Modern Criminal Procedure is the Requirement of Reasonableness
2.3 The Principle of Democracy-The Guidance on Dynamic Balance
2.3.1 The Essence of Democracy
2.3.2 The Internal Values of Democracy
2.3.3 Deliberative Democracy-the Development of the Theory of Democracy
2.3.4 Procedual Democracy-The form of Deliberative Democracy in Criminal Procedure
Chapter 3 Basic Principles of Achieving a Balance in Criminal Procedure
3.1 The Presumption of the Principle of Innocence
3.1.1 The Meaning of the Presumption of the Principle of Innocence
3.1.2 The Values of the Presumption of the Principle of Innocence
3.1.3 The Significance of the Presumption of the Principle of Innocence in Constucting Balancing Mechanisms
3.2 The Principle of Accusatory Procedure
3.2.1 The Meaning and Essence of the Principle of Accusatory Procedure
3.2.2 The Specific Requirements of the Principle of Accusatory Procedure in Constucting Banlancing Mechanisms
3.3 The Principle of Proportionalily
3.3.1 Origin of the Principle of Proportionality
3.3.2 The Meaning of the Proportionality Principle
3.3.3 Application of the Principle of Proportionality
3.3.4 Significance of the Principle of Proportionality in Achieving a Balance in Criminal Process
3.4 The Rule of Warrants
3.4.1 The Meaning of the Rule of Warrants
3.4.2 Essence of the Rule of Warrants
3.4.3 Significance of the Rule of Warrants in Achieving a Balance in Criminal Process
3.5 The Rule Against Double deoparcly
3.5.1 The Meaning and Application of the Rule Against Doubel Jeopardy
3.5.2 Signifacance of the Rule Against Doubel Jeopardy
3.5.3 Exceptions to the Rule Against Double Jeopardy
3.5.4 The Development of the Rule Against Double Jeopardy and Justice for all
Chapter 4 Balancing Mechanisms in Criminal Procedure
4.1 The Court of Law(or the judge) is the Balancer of Modem Criminal Justice
4.1.1 Nature of Judicial Power
4.1.2 Characteristics of Judicial Power
4.1.3 Functions of Modern Judicial Power
4.2 Balancing Mechanisms in Pretrial Process
4.2.1 The Mechanism of Judicial Review
4.2.2 The Protection of Defendant's Rights
4.2.3 Summaruze
4.3 Discovery and Other Balancing Mechanisms in Pretrial Process
4.3.1 Discovery
4.3.2 Defense's Right of Reading in Civil Law Coutries
4.3.3 Summaruze
4.4 Balancing Mechanisms in Trial Process
4.4.1 Mechanisms Guarranting Defense and Procecuation with Equal Arms
4.4.2 Selection of Trial Model and Constuction of Crimial Procedure from the Prospective of the Balance Theory
4.4.3 Summaruze
PART TWO THE IMPROVEMENT OF CHINA' S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FROM THE PROSPECTIVE OF THE THEORY OF THE BALANCE
Chapter 5 Establishment of the Theory of Balance in China's Criminal Procedure
5. 1 The Need for the Establishment of the Theory of Balance
5.1. 1 The Imbalance of the View of the Criminal Procedure Law
5.1.2 The Imbalance of the Criminal Justice System
5.2 Social Conditions of Establishing the Theory of Balance
5.2.1 Economic Condition:the Estabishment and Development of Communist Market Economy
5.2.2 Political Conditions:Communist Democracy and Rule by Law
5.2.3 Cultural Condition : People First
5.2.4 Globalization and Protection of Human Rights
5.3 The Estabishment of the Theory of BaLance in China's Criminal Procedure
5.3.1 Estabishing the Balance Theory of Interests Involved
5.3.2 Estabishing the Balance Theory of Values
5.3.3 Estabishing the Theory of General Function of the Criminal Procedure
Chapter 6 Criminal Procedural Structure from the Prospective of the Theory of Balance
6.1 Criminal Proceedural Structure
6. 1. 1 Reasonable Analysis of Chinese Criminal Proceedural Structure
6.1.2 Reconstruction of Chinese Criminal Proceedural Structure from the Perspective of the Theory of Balance
6.2 The Basic Procedural Rights of Participant
6.2. 1 The Basic Procedural Rights of Defendant
6.2.2 The Basic Procedural Rights of Victim
6.3 Reform of Specific Criminal Procedure
6.3.1 Standardization of Pretrial Procedure
6.3.2 Reform of trial Procedure
6.3.3 Reform of Retrial Procedure
Bibliography
Postscript
c0
B